I've been checking out various Burnham and Story genealogies lately. None get the parentage of my ancestress Mary (Burnham) Story correct. She was the daughter of Thomas2-1 and Mary (Lawrence) Burnham. [START GRANDPA MODE] Back in the day, one used a unique genealogical tool called AGBI (American Genealogical & Biographical Index). It is an immense set (hundreds of volumes) that indexed an amazing set of documents including the 1790 census, vital records, revolutionary war service papers, etc. One thing they also indexed was the genealogical column in The Boston Evening Transcript. In the December 12, 1927 issue, item #6418, it reads:
"What became of the Mary (3) Burnham, daughter of Lt. Thomas (2) [Thomas (1)] Burnham? It would seem that she must be the Mary published Ipswich, 1710 to Samuel Story and later removed to Norwich, Conn. Three of the sons of Lt. Thomas (2) Burnham settled or lived in Norwich at various times."
It seems only this person knew the truth. And it also seems that only I have seen this newspaper item. All the Story and Burnham genealogies published in the last 20 years (4!) all claim that she is the daughter of John2-1. It is true that Eleazer Burnham moved to Norwich and died there before 17 July 1744 when his will was proved. Aaron Burnham lived there for a while before settling in Windham where he died on 18 August 1727. Mary's father married as his second wife (and her second husband), Esther (Cogswell) Bishop. Two of her sons by her first marriage settled in Norwich: Samuel and John Bishop.
Sadly Thomas2 lived a long life and left no will or probate. Also, Mary never named a child Thomas or Lydia. So there is some doubt, but certainly this seems most likely. We know that John2 (Thomas1) left a will dated 30 December 1703 in which he notes "his youngest daughter Mary not yet of age." (Essex Co. Probate 308:146). So he has a Mary born after 1683. John2-1 also leaves a will dated 17 December 1708 (Essex Co. Probate 310:83-85) in which he notes "my three youngest daughters, Mary, Elizabeth, and Hannah Burnham, to get 30 pounds when they marry or come to age 21." So he has a daughter named Mary born after 1688. However, his widow, Sarah left her own will dated 20 December 1733 (Essex Co. Probate 327:28-30) in which she makes bequests to all her children, including Elizabeth Choate and Hannah Poole, but not Mary. This probably indicates that Mary was dead, and we know Mary Story is alive and well on 11 October 1748 in Norwich, Conn. as she administered her husband's estate. So we can eliminate John2-1 pretty easily. Lastly, there's James2 (Thomas1) who married a Mary. In his will dated 27 June 1729 (Essex County Probate 319:223) he calls his daughter Mary Tuttle, identifying her as the Mary who married Charles Tuttle on 22 March 1703.
The problem with the Burnham family of Ipswich is that no one has done the hard work to do the family correctly. John1 has two sons: John2 and Josiah2. Josiah had three son: Ebenezer, Josiah and Jacob. John had John, Thomas, Jonathan, and Robert. Thomas1 had Thomas, John, James, Joseph and Nathaniel. Thomas2-1 had Thomas, Moses, Aaron, Eleazer, and Daniel. John2 (Thomas1) had John, Thomas, Joseph, Jacob, Jonathan, and David. So you have an explosion of Johns and Thomases and others. The only way to decipher them is through DEEDS. But no one has done that yet. You see you must look in three places for Ipswich 17th century deeds: The Ipswich Deeds (they kept them on the town level--the only one in Massachusetts to do that); the Old Norfolk County Deeds, and lastly Essex County Deeds.
Someday I'll just have to grit my teeth and plow through all those deeds and the court cases in order to figure out who's who.
Recent Comments